header-logo header-logo

Safeguarding the public from unregulated providers

07 May 2024
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Profession , Consumer
printer mail-detail
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published draft guidance to protect consumers against risks posed by unregulated will writing, online divorce and pre-paid probate services

At least 3,800 unregulated legal services providers operate in England and Wales, according to the CMA.

Its draft guidance, published last week, is designed to promote compliance with existing legal requirements rather than reform the law. It aims to guard against misleading or aggressive sales tactics, ensure consumers can make informed decisions, promote the use of fair terms and conditions, and ensure services are performed with reasonable care and skill.

The draft guidance includes checklists for providers and case-studies illustrating what can go wrong. Its publication follows a CMA investigation last summer into pressure-selling of pre-paid probate plans on the elderly, misleading claims regarding online divorce services and will writing. Other concerns included the loss of valuable documents if the firm ceased trading.

The CMA aims to conclude the consultation and publish a final version of the draft guidance by the end of the year.

Sarah Manuel, head of professional standards at STEP (Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners) said: ‘STEP and its members have long been concerned over the poor practices of a small number of unregulated practitioners.’

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘We share the concerns raised by the CMA about possible breaches of consumer protection law such as misleading advertising, pressure selling and coercion of vulnerable customers.’

‘Although will-writing itself is not a regulated service, consumers face potential risks when using unregulated will writers or services. This may result in writing a will that is not legally valid. When writing a will, we encourage consumers to use a solicitor.’

Respond to the ‘Draft consumer protection law compliance guidance for unregulated providers of will writing and other legal services’ by 13 June.

Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Profession , Consumer
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll