header-logo header-logo

04 January 2007
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Save our skins

In brief

The European Commission is proposing a ban on the sale of cat and dog fur. The prohibition, which will also cover the
production, import and export of pelts, will be
enforced by testing to determine if products are of canine or feline origin, even if they have been treated or dyed. Anti-fur campaigners claim that twomillion cats and dogs are killed annually for their fur, which is often passed off as fake, because it is cheaper than the synthetic version. However, the
International Fur Trader Federation says the ban is unnecessary, as there is no evidence of the trade in the EU.

Issue: 7254 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll