header-logo header-logo

Save our skins

04 January 2007
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

In brief

The European Commission is proposing a ban on the sale of cat and dog fur. The prohibition, which will also cover the
production, import and export of pelts, will be
enforced by testing to determine if products are of canine or feline origin, even if they have been treated or dyed. Anti-fur campaigners claim that twomillion cats and dogs are killed annually for their fur, which is often passed off as fake, because it is cheaper than the synthetic version. However, the
International Fur Trader Federation says the ban is unnecessary, as there is no evidence of the trade in the EU.

Issue: 7254 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll