header-logo header-logo

Section 21 sent packing

02 May 2019 / Dominic Bright
Issue: 7838 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Dominic Bright provides an overview of the challenges & consequences of the government’s move to end ‘no-fault’ evictions

  • End of ‘no-fault’ evictions through repeal of Section 21 of the Housing Act 1998.
  • Strengthening Section 8 so that landlords are able to regain their property should they wish to sell, or move in.

In the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government’s Overcoming the Barriers to Longer Tenancies in the Private Rented Sector (April 2019), the government announced that ‘we will introduce a generational change to the law that governs private renting. This government will put an end to “no-fault” evictions by repealing Section 21 of the Housing Act 1988’ [8]. All subsequent references are to paragraphs in this document. It was rightly described as a ‘significant step’ [28]. One reason is that, ‘on the whole landlords were resistant to the removal of the Section 21 “no-fault” eviction procedure’ [22].

Last year, over eight weeks, the government consulted on longer tenancies, proposing a new, three-year model. Over 8,500 responses were received.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll