header-logo header-logo

27 November 2015 / Fan Yang
Issue: 7678 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Securing loans on goods

nlj_7678_yan

Should individuals be given more protection, asks Fan Yang

If an individual wants to use their existing goods as security for a loan, they need to use two Victorian pieces of legislation: the Bills of Sale Act 1878 and the Bills of Sale Act (1878) Amendment Act 1882. These complex and archaic statutes leave both borrowers and potential purchasers in a very insecure position. The Law Commission is currently consulting on whether to repeal the Bills of Sale Acts and replace them with a new “Goods Mortgages Act”.

Bills of sale

A bill of sale can be taken over any goods, with examples being fine wine, valuable paintings and even a herd of cows. However, by far the most common example in modern times is the logbook loan.

When a borrower takes out a logbook loan, they transfer ownership of their existing car, van or motorcycle to the lender. If the borrower keeps up the repayments, they may keep using the vehicle. But if the borrower defaults, the lender can seize the vehicle and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll