header-logo header-logo

30 April 2009 / Mark Solon
Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Selecting the best

Part three: Experts and the CPR; Mark Solon goes back to basics

Parts 1 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), on the overriding objective and case management, provide the framework for the court management of expert evidence.

Pt 1: dealing with a case justly

The overriding objective (dealing with a case justly), includes principles of particular relevance to expert evidence: ensuring the parties are on an equal footing; saving expense and dealing with the case in ways which are proportionate to the amount of money involved, the importance of the case, the complexity of the issues and the financial position of the parties; encouraging the parties to co-operate (for instance in the selection and instruction of a single joint expert); and identifying issues at an early stage.

Pt 3: case management

This gives judges wide discretionary powers to give directions and set timetables, including for the disclosure of evidence. The judge can act on paper on his/her own initiative, on application of the parties, or take decisions at case management conferences. Statements

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll