header-logo header-logo

Senior law firm members tasked with building culture of fairness & respect

03 May 2023
Issue: 8023 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Mental health , Career focus
printer mail-detail
Solicitors have been issued with updated guidance on health and wellbeing in the workplace.

The updates encompass rules introduced in April, following approval by the Legal Services Board. They include specific obligations in the codes of conduct for both firms and individuals to treat colleagues fairly and with respect, and not to engage in bullying, harassment or unfair discrimination. They also clarify the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA’s) approach where a solicitor’s health issues may affect their ability to practise or to participate in SRA enforcement processes.

The SRA amended its initial proposal to require solicitors to challenge any unfair treatment they witnessed. Instead, this requirement is imposed on the top managers of firms such as partners. Under the guidance, firms are expected to build a working culture where junior staff feel able to complain without fear of recriminations.

When assessing unfair treatment, the SRA will take into account whether it could reasonably be seen by others as intended to bully, belittle, harass, intimidate, undermine or take advantage of colleagues. The regulator will consider the seniority and level of control or influence of those involved, and whether individuals have specific characteristics or vulnerabilities.

‘Colleagues’ include those with whom the solicitor works closely, including contractors, consultants, barristers and experts. Managers should intervene immediately and effectively but not necessarily formally, to stop unfair conduct, and the SRA does not prescribe the manner of intervention.

Concerns about the pressures on solicitors were highlighted last year in an SRA workplace culture thematic review, and have also been raised by the charity LawCare and the Junior Lawyers Division of the Law Society.

SRA chief executive Paul Philip said law firm management becomes a regulatory issue ‘if poor working cultures start to impact staff wellbeing, behaviour and ultimately standards of service to the public’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll