header-logo header-logo

03 May 2023
Issue: 8023 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Mental health , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Senior law firm members tasked with building culture of fairness & respect

Solicitors have been issued with updated guidance on health and wellbeing in the workplace.

The updates encompass rules introduced in April, following approval by the Legal Services Board. They include specific obligations in the codes of conduct for both firms and individuals to treat colleagues fairly and with respect, and not to engage in bullying, harassment or unfair discrimination. They also clarify the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA’s) approach where a solicitor’s health issues may affect their ability to practise or to participate in SRA enforcement processes.

The SRA amended its initial proposal to require solicitors to challenge any unfair treatment they witnessed. Instead, this requirement is imposed on the top managers of firms such as partners. Under the guidance, firms are expected to build a working culture where junior staff feel able to complain without fear of recriminations.

When assessing unfair treatment, the SRA will take into account whether it could reasonably be seen by others as intended to bully, belittle, harass, intimidate, undermine or take advantage of colleagues. The regulator will consider the seniority and level of control or influence of those involved, and whether individuals have specific characteristics or vulnerabilities.

‘Colleagues’ include those with whom the solicitor works closely, including contractors, consultants, barristers and experts. Managers should intervene immediately and effectively but not necessarily formally, to stop unfair conduct, and the SRA does not prescribe the manner of intervention.

Concerns about the pressures on solicitors were highlighted last year in an SRA workplace culture thematic review, and have also been raised by the charity LawCare and the Junior Lawyers Division of the Law Society.

SRA chief executive Paul Philip said law firm management becomes a regulatory issue ‘if poor working cultures start to impact staff wellbeing, behaviour and ultimately standards of service to the public’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll