header-logo header-logo

03 May 2023
Issue: 8023 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Mental health , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Senior law firm members tasked with building culture of fairness & respect

Solicitors have been issued with updated guidance on health and wellbeing in the workplace.

The updates encompass rules introduced in April, following approval by the Legal Services Board. They include specific obligations in the codes of conduct for both firms and individuals to treat colleagues fairly and with respect, and not to engage in bullying, harassment or unfair discrimination. They also clarify the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA’s) approach where a solicitor’s health issues may affect their ability to practise or to participate in SRA enforcement processes.

The SRA amended its initial proposal to require solicitors to challenge any unfair treatment they witnessed. Instead, this requirement is imposed on the top managers of firms such as partners. Under the guidance, firms are expected to build a working culture where junior staff feel able to complain without fear of recriminations.

When assessing unfair treatment, the SRA will take into account whether it could reasonably be seen by others as intended to bully, belittle, harass, intimidate, undermine or take advantage of colleagues. The regulator will consider the seniority and level of control or influence of those involved, and whether individuals have specific characteristics or vulnerabilities.

‘Colleagues’ include those with whom the solicitor works closely, including contractors, consultants, barristers and experts. Managers should intervene immediately and effectively but not necessarily formally, to stop unfair conduct, and the SRA does not prescribe the manner of intervention.

Concerns about the pressures on solicitors were highlighted last year in an SRA workplace culture thematic review, and have also been raised by the charity LawCare and the Junior Lawyers Division of the Law Society.

SRA chief executive Paul Philip said law firm management becomes a regulatory issue ‘if poor working cultures start to impact staff wellbeing, behaviour and ultimately standards of service to the public’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll