header-logo header-logo

20 October 2023 / Michelle de Kluyver , Nichola Peters , Harriet Territt
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Senior manager attribution: a new liability?

143305
Michelle de Kluyver, Nichola Peters & Harriet Territt discuss whether the Economic Crime & Corporate Transparency Bill creates a new breed of corporate criminal liability in the UK
  • The introduction of a statutory test for corporate criminal liability is potentially a game-changer; making it easier to prosecute larger businesses in the UK.
  • This article highlights key elements of the proposed law, including its extraterritorial reach, and explores the absence of statutory defences as well as the potential impact on Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs).
  • Business owners, senior managers and legal professionals alike need to understand the implications and consider what measures can be put in place to mitigate potential risks.

One of the most significant changes to the landscape of corporate criminal liability for a generation looks likely if the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill (the Bill) is passed in either its current or similar form. The Bill makes a significant change to the common law identification doctrine in response to longstanding calls

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll