header-logo header-logo

10 April 2019
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Sentencing Council issues mental health guidelines for judges

For the first time, judges and magistrates are to be given guidelines to help them assess responsibility when sentencing offenders with mental health conditions.

Draft guidance published this week by the Sentencing Council aims to provide a process to follow when sentencing people with mental health conditions or conditions such as learning disabilities, autism, brain injury, substance misuse disorders and dementia.

Lucy Schonegevel, head of health influencing at Rethink Mental Illness, said: ‘This is a big step towards the justice system having a better understanding of mental illness, as it’s the first time there will be specific sentencing guidelines in this area.’

There is a lack of reliable data on mental illness in prisons. According to a 2017 National Audit Office report, however, one survey of recent arrivals at prison found nearly a quarter had prior contact with mental health services; 17% of the prison population is thought to have a learning disability compared to 2% of the population; the proportion of prisoners with autism is believed to be double that within the general population; and nearly a quarter of prisoners have been hospitalised for a head injury.

The guidance takes the form of principles to be applied by judges alongside offence-specific guidelines. The principles include that the courts: focus on individual circumstances; balance the rights and needs of offenders with the protection of the public and rights and needs of victims and their families to feel safe; and consider all the facts in each case, including what is practically available.

Sentencing Council member Judge Rosa Dean said the council believed ‘offenders who have a mental health condition or disorder, neurological impairment or developmental disorder should be confident that the court has the information it needs to take a consistent approach’.

The Sentencing Council consultation, ‘Overarching Principles: Sentencing Offenders with Mental Health Conditions or Disorders’, ends on 9 July 2019 .

Issue: 7836 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll