header-logo header-logo

10 April 2019
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Sentencing Council issues mental health guidelines for judges

For the first time, judges and magistrates are to be given guidelines to help them assess responsibility when sentencing offenders with mental health conditions.

Draft guidance published this week by the Sentencing Council aims to provide a process to follow when sentencing people with mental health conditions or conditions such as learning disabilities, autism, brain injury, substance misuse disorders and dementia.

Lucy Schonegevel, head of health influencing at Rethink Mental Illness, said: ‘This is a big step towards the justice system having a better understanding of mental illness, as it’s the first time there will be specific sentencing guidelines in this area.’

There is a lack of reliable data on mental illness in prisons. According to a 2017 National Audit Office report, however, one survey of recent arrivals at prison found nearly a quarter had prior contact with mental health services; 17% of the prison population is thought to have a learning disability compared to 2% of the population; the proportion of prisoners with autism is believed to be double that within the general population; and nearly a quarter of prisoners have been hospitalised for a head injury.

The guidance takes the form of principles to be applied by judges alongside offence-specific guidelines. The principles include that the courts: focus on individual circumstances; balance the rights and needs of offenders with the protection of the public and rights and needs of victims and their families to feel safe; and consider all the facts in each case, including what is practically available.

Sentencing Council member Judge Rosa Dean said the council believed ‘offenders who have a mental health condition or disorder, neurological impairment or developmental disorder should be confident that the court has the information it needs to take a consistent approach’.

The Sentencing Council consultation, ‘Overarching Principles: Sentencing Offenders with Mental Health Conditions or Disorders’, ends on 9 July 2019 .

Issue: 7836 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll