header-logo header-logo

07 February 2024
Issue: 8058 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Sentencing guidelines: Blackmail & kidnapping

Judges are to be given guidelines for the first time on sentencing blackmail, kidnap and false imprisonment offences

The Sentencing Council published draft guidelines last week proposing a range of sentences, from a community order to 12 years in prison for blackmail, and from six months to 16 years for kidnap and false imprisonment.

Council member Mrs Justice Juliet May said: ‘In some of the cases, victims suffer substantial harm at the hands of the offenders.’

The draft guidelines propose additional wording to make judges aware there is evidence of disparity in sentence outcomes: between 2018 and 2022, white offenders received on average five years four months in custody, but black offenders received seven years nine months, and Asian offenders six years one month.

Respond to the consultation by 24 April.

Issue: 8058 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Sophie Fulwell

Freeths—Sophie Fulwell

National firm strengthens Liverpool employment practice with director hire

Cargo Law—Francesca Santoro

Cargo Law—Francesca Santoro

Specialist marine law firm expands disputes practice with senior hire

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

NEWS
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
back-to-top-scroll