header-logo header-logo

Sentencing guidelines: Blackmail & kidnapping

07 February 2024
Issue: 8058 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Judges are to be given guidelines for the first time on sentencing blackmail, kidnap and false imprisonment offences

The Sentencing Council published draft guidelines last week proposing a range of sentences, from a community order to 12 years in prison for blackmail, and from six months to 16 years for kidnap and false imprisonment.

Council member Mrs Justice Juliet May said: ‘In some of the cases, victims suffer substantial harm at the hands of the offenders.’

The draft guidelines propose additional wording to make judges aware there is evidence of disparity in sentence outcomes: between 2018 and 2022, white offenders received on average five years four months in custody, but black offenders received seven years nine months, and Asian offenders six years one month.

Respond to the consultation by 24 April.

Issue: 8058 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll