header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 October 2023 / Rona Epstein , Dr Hugh Williams
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Sentencing mothers & the rights of the child

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
143303
Rona Epstein & Hugh Williams report on the background & history of sentencing a parent of dependent children
  • Carla Foster was sent to prison for obtaining a miscarriage, but the Court of Appeal suspended the sentence.
  • Covers circumstances where a sentence should be suspended, the rights of the child when sentencing parents, and what advocates, magistrates and judges should know.

On 12 June 2023, Carla Foster was sentenced by Mr Justice Pepperall to an immediate term of 28 months’ imprisonment for procuring an abortion, contrary to the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (s 58). Foster had pleaded guilty to this charge as an alternative to an original charge of child destruction. The abortion took place in May 2020, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when she was 32 to 34 weeks’ pregnant, past the 24-week point where the abortion would have been legal. Foster’s sentence was appealed, coming before the Court of Appeal Criminal Division before Dame Victoria Sharp, Lord Justice Holdroyde

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

Commercial property and child law teams expand with senior hires

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Set expands London and Singapore offering with senior international disputes hires

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Firm strengthens real estate and litigation teams with partner promotions

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Uber’s legal shield faces scrutiny on both sides of the Atlantic
Uber has built a formidable strategy for insulating itself from liability for drivers’ conduct, but the legal terrain differs sharply between the US and England and Wales
NLJ this week: Is it finally time to scrap Part III?
The Civil Justice Council’s review of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 could mark the end of what one commentator calls an ‘outdated’ and overly technical regime governing solicitor-client fee disputes
NLJ this week: Hereditary peers era finally comes to an end
The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 marks a constitutional watershed by severing the centuries-old link between hereditary titles and automatic membership of the upper chamber
NLJ this week: Courts tighten scrutiny of AI and public power
Artificial intelligence, proportionality and public decision-making are under increasing judicial scrutiny, according to the latest public law round-up from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
NLJ this week: Why handshake property deals rarely survive court
Families relying on informal agreements over property ownership could face costly consequences if disputes arise, the High Court has warned
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll