header-logo header-logo

31 May 2023
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Legal News , Health & safety , Employment , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Serco failed to protect court officers

Security firm Serco has been fined £2.25m and ordered to pay £433,596 in costs at the Old Bailey for health and safety failings following the death of custody officer Lorraine Barwell.

The deceased, who had worked for Serco for ten years, died from brain injuries after being kicked in the head at Blackfriars Crown Court in 2015 during the restraint of a prisoner in custody.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that Serco had failed to properly analyse risk intelligence on prisoners and communicate risks and safety precautions to staff. There was a failure to have sufficient procedures in place and follow them, to provide readily accessible protective equipment, and to ensure further training was provided where identified as required.

The HSE also highlighted a continued failure to adequately staff court activities, manage working hours, assess risks of violence and aggression, communicate critical safety information, have suitable procedures in place, and to work in accordance with those procedures covering a period of over three years. Time pressures, staffing levels and business priorities had led to routine violations of procedures by staff in order to get the job done, which had gone unchallenged. This is despite such failings being brought to their attentions by HM Prisons Inspectorate, the Ministry of Justice, HSE Inspectors and Serco’s own staff.

A separate incident occurred at Woolwich Court annex in 2016, during which a member of staff was rammed against a wall and strangled. Help was delayed as there were no staff manning the annex to respond to the alarm button—there should have been 32 Serco officers at court that day, but there were only 22. 

HSE inspector Helen Donnelly said: ‘Serco drastically failed in their duties to protect both Lorraine Barwell and other staff over a sustained period. Had Serco carried out their legal duties, these incidents could have been prevented.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridgestrengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll