header-logo header-logo

09 June 2021
Issue: 7936 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Inquests
printer mail-detail

Settlements reached on Hillsborough claims

Two police forces have agreed to settle claims of survivors and friends and family of those who died in the 1989 Hillsborough disaster for the cover up that followed, law firm Edwin Coe has confirmed

The disaster at the FA Cup semi-final 32 years ago killed 96 Liverpool fans, and their families and friends have endured a gruelling campaign for justice.

A trial against two retired police officers and a solicitor accused of perverting the course of justice collapsed in May after Mr Justice William Davis ruled there was insufficient evidence for the trial to proceed. The three, who all worked for South Yorkshire Police, were each accused of two counts of doing acts tending and intended to pervert the course of justice. All three were acquitted.

However, David Greene, senior partner of Edwin Coe, confirmed last week that South Yorkshire Police and West Midlands Police have since agreed settlement with 600 claimants including survivors and families of the 96 deceased. The settlement was agreed with all law firms representing clients under the Group Litigation Order and is agreed in principle and yet to be quantified on an individual basis. All Edwin Coe clients were in the stadium on the day.

Greene said the compensation relates to the post-disaster cover up and misfeasance in public office.

‘Despite recent comments following the criminal case collapse there was definitely a cover up and misfeasance in public office,’ Greene said.

‘The cover-up was detailed by the Hillsborough Independent Panel in September 2012, its existence was accepted by the then Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire police, acknowledged by the then Prime Minister David Cameron, and by the Lord Chief Justice of the High Court. The Inquest jury in the 2014-2016 inquests found that the behaviour of the fans did not contribute to the deaths of the 96. The attempt to rewrite history is an affront to those that died, the survivors and families.

‘We trust that a settlement will put an end to any fresh attempts to rewrite the record and wrongly claim that there was no cover-up. In so commenting, we contrast the dignity of the bereaved families and the supporters, with the conduct of those who still seek to peddle the discredited lies of the past.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll