header-logo header-logo

Court-appointed assessors: shadows in the world of fact determination? (Pt 2)

15 March 2024 / Ian Gascoigne
Issue: 8063 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail
163753
Ian Gascoigne looks to the Admiralty to scrutinise the role of court-appointed assessors
  • In ‘Judicial notice: shadows in the world of fact determination (Pt 1)’ (NLJ, 9 February 2024, p13), Ian Gascoigne considered the usefulness of judicial notice as a shortcut, and examined its limited application.
  • Here in Pt 2 of the two-part series, he discusses the role of court-appointed assessors in the civil court system, determining whether they genuinely help fact determination or undermine transparency

In resolving factual conflicts between parties in a civil case, the trial judge will evaluate the evidence and decide, on the balance of probabilities, which side has offered the more likely version.

What if the judge does not fully understand technical aspects of the evidence, parts that are critical to the decision? In many cases, expert evidence will be called, and the expert(s) can explain technical processes. Expert evidence is not permitted, however, in each case in which there are aspects outside a judge’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll