header-logo header-logo

Court-appointed assessors: shadows in the world of fact determination? (Pt 2)

15 March 2024 / Ian Gascoigne
Issue: 8063 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail
163753
Ian Gascoigne looks to the Admiralty to scrutinise the role of court-appointed assessors
  • In ‘Judicial notice: shadows in the world of fact determination (Pt 1)’ (NLJ, 9 February 2024, p13), Ian Gascoigne considered the usefulness of judicial notice as a shortcut, and examined its limited application.
  • Here in Pt 2 of the two-part series, he discusses the role of court-appointed assessors in the civil court system, determining whether they genuinely help fact determination or undermine transparency

In resolving factual conflicts between parties in a civil case, the trial judge will evaluate the evidence and decide, on the balance of probabilities, which side has offered the more likely version.

What if the judge does not fully understand technical aspects of the evidence, parts that are critical to the decision? In many cases, expert evidence will be called, and the expert(s) can explain technical processes. Expert evidence is not permitted, however, in each case in which there are aspects outside a judge’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll