header-logo header-logo

Court-appointed assessors: shadows in the world of fact determination? (Pt 2)

15 March 2024 / Ian Gascoigne
Issue: 8063 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail
163753
Ian Gascoigne looks to the Admiralty to scrutinise the role of court-appointed assessors
  • In ‘Judicial notice: shadows in the world of fact determination (Pt 1)’ (NLJ, 9 February 2024, p13), Ian Gascoigne considered the usefulness of judicial notice as a shortcut, and examined its limited application.
  • Here in Pt 2 of the two-part series, he discusses the role of court-appointed assessors in the civil court system, determining whether they genuinely help fact determination or undermine transparency

In resolving factual conflicts between parties in a civil case, the trial judge will evaluate the evidence and decide, on the balance of probabilities, which side has offered the more likely version.

What if the judge does not fully understand technical aspects of the evidence, parts that are critical to the decision? In many cases, expert evidence will be called, and the expert(s) can explain technical processes. Expert evidence is not permitted, however, in each case in which there are aspects outside a judge’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll