header-logo header-logo

Shareholder relief: finding clarity

12 April 2024 / Lizzie Shimmin , Sol Gelsomino
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Company , Commercial
printer mail-detail
167831
The Court of Appeal has set a clearer path for shareholders seeking multiple forms of relief following wrongdoing in a company. Lizzie Shimmin & Sol Gelsomino report
  • In Ntzegkoutanis v Kimionis and others [2023], the Court of Appeal clarified the circumstances in which minority shareholders can seek relief in favour of a company in unfair prejudice proceedings, without needing to engage the derivative action statutory regime.
  • This judgment sets out a helpful list of key legal principles on seeking relief on behalf of the company by a minority shareholder via an unfair prejudice petition. It includes safeguards to protect against perceived attempts to improperly bypass the derivative action statutory regime.

There has, to date, been a lack of clarity on the circumstances in which a shareholder may seek relief on behalf of a company as part of an unfair prejudice petition. The distinction is important given the stringent requirements of the derivative action regime, and because of concerns that a shareholder may bypass that regime by effectively bringing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll