header-logo header-logo

Shareholder relief: finding clarity

12 April 2024 / Lizzie Shimmin , Sol Gelsomino
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Company , Commercial
printer mail-detail
167831
The Court of Appeal has set a clearer path for shareholders seeking multiple forms of relief following wrongdoing in a company. Lizzie Shimmin & Sol Gelsomino report
  • In Ntzegkoutanis v Kimionis and others [2023], the Court of Appeal clarified the circumstances in which minority shareholders can seek relief in favour of a company in unfair prejudice proceedings, without needing to engage the derivative action statutory regime.
  • This judgment sets out a helpful list of key legal principles on seeking relief on behalf of the company by a minority shareholder via an unfair prejudice petition. It includes safeguards to protect against perceived attempts to improperly bypass the derivative action statutory regime.

There has, to date, been a lack of clarity on the circumstances in which a shareholder may seek relief on behalf of a company as part of an unfair prejudice petition. The distinction is important given the stringent requirements of the derivative action regime, and because of concerns that a shareholder may bypass that regime by effectively bringing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll