header-logo header-logo

Shipping—Charterparty—BIMCO Supplytime 1989 form

14 December 2012
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Greatship (India) Ltd v Oceanografia SA de CV [2012] EWHC 3468 (Comm), [2012] All ER (D) 38 (Dec)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Gloster J, 5 December 2012

On the proper construction of cl 10(e) of the BIMCO Supplytime 89 form, in order for owners’ right “to suspend performance of any and all of their obligations” to be validly exercised, owners are not required to give charterers five banking days’ notice of the suspension.

Nigel Jacobs QC (instructed by Holman Fenwick Willan LLP) for the owners. Yash Kulkarni (instructed by Thomas Cooper) for the charterers.

By a time charterparty on an amended BIMCO Supplytime 1989 form, the claimant owners agreed to charter a vessel to the defendant charterers for two years firm. The charterparty contained a London arbitration clause. Further, cl 10(e) of the charterparty provided, inter alia: “While payment remains due owners shall be entitled to suspend the performance of any and all of their obligations hereunder.” The owners purported to suspend the provision of the services

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll