header-logo header-logo

21 November 2025 / Tim Malloch
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Shock & ‘overawe’?

236030
Tim Malloch looks back at the repression of the Chartists & finds echoes in our more recent past

The eloquence of the Chartists terrified the UK government. In a word, it was charisma. According to historian Miles Taylor, what troubled people about the Chartists was that they were led by a bunch of charmers: speakers who could get their working-class audiences so worked up, they would have no control over their behaviour.

William Cuffay, an articulate Black tailor born in Chatham, became a prominent Chartist in London. For Cuffay, charm on its own wasn’t enough. It would be necessary to use, at least, the threat of some form of physical force. On 9 April 1848, he is reported as saying: ‘This clapping of hands is all very fine, but will you fight for it?’ At his trial later that year, he denied plotting to overthrow the UK government.

The Treason Felony Act 1848 (TFA 1848) was passed to silence the Chartists. It was debated by Parliament at the same time as the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll