header-logo header-logo

21 November 2025 / Tim Malloch
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Shock & ‘overawe’?

236030
Tim Malloch looks back at the repression of the Chartists & finds echoes in our more recent past

The eloquence of the Chartists terrified the UK government. In a word, it was charisma. According to historian Miles Taylor, what troubled people about the Chartists was that they were led by a bunch of charmers: speakers who could get their working-class audiences so worked up, they would have no control over their behaviour.

William Cuffay, an articulate Black tailor born in Chatham, became a prominent Chartist in London. For Cuffay, charm on its own wasn’t enough. It would be necessary to use, at least, the threat of some form of physical force. On 9 April 1848, he is reported as saying: ‘This clapping of hands is all very fine, but will you fight for it?’ At his trial later that year, he denied plotting to overthrow the UK government.

The Treason Felony Act 1848 (TFA 1848) was passed to silence the Chartists. It was debated by Parliament at the same time as the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll