header-logo header-logo

Shock & ‘overawe’?

21 November 2025 / Tim Malloch
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Brexit
printer mail-detail
236030
Tim Malloch looks back at the repression of the Chartists & finds echoes in our more recent past

The eloquence of the Chartists terrified the UK government. In a word, it was charisma. According to historian Miles Taylor, what troubled people about the Chartists was that they were led by a bunch of charmers: speakers who could get their working-class audiences so worked up, they would have no control over their behaviour.

William Cuffay, an articulate Black tailor born in Chatham, became a prominent Chartist in London. For Cuffay, charm on its own wasn’t enough. It would be necessary to use, at least, the threat of some form of physical force. On 9 April 1848, he is reported as saying: ‘This clapping of hands is all very fine, but will you fight for it?’ At his trial later that year, he denied plotting to overthrow the UK government.

The Treason Felony Act 1848 (TFA 1848) was passed to silence the Chartists. It was debated by Parliament at the same time as the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Insurance and corporate teams in London announce double partner hire

Fieldfisher—Chris Cartmell

Fieldfisher—Chris Cartmell

Technology and data practice bolstered by partner hire

South Square—Tony Beswetherick KC

South Square—Tony Beswetherick KC

Set strengthens civil fraud and insolvency offering with new member

NEWS
NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925 
HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)
NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll