header-logo header-logo

A sigh of relief

Part one: Andrew Burns unravels the strands of the asbestos “trigger” trial

The employers’ liability (EL) policy “trigger” litigation was heard over nine weeks in the summer of 2008. It involved six lead cases, seven QCs, 13 junior counsel, numerous solicitors and five major insurers. Mr Justice Burton handed down a 109-page judgment on 21 November 2008: Durham v BAI (Run Off) Ltd (In Scheme of A0.rrangement) and other cases [2008] EWHC 2692 (QB), [2008] All ER (D) 220 (Nov).

The various test cases were heard together to resolve an important dispute over the relevant “trigger” under various employer’s liability insurance policies. The judge noted that the result would have “considerable consequences for several thousand people” and a “continuing impact for many years”.
The underlying claims were brought by employees who suffered and died from mesothelioma resulting from inhalation of asbestos fibres during employment. The employers’ insurers in these types of claims had paid out to victims for many years, but began to decline claims after a decision in the Court of Appeal
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll