header-logo header-logo

A sigh of relief

Part one: Andrew Burns unravels the strands of the asbestos “trigger” trial

The employers’ liability (EL) policy “trigger” litigation was heard over nine weeks in the summer of 2008. It involved six lead cases, seven QCs, 13 junior counsel, numerous solicitors and five major insurers. Mr Justice Burton handed down a 109-page judgment on 21 November 2008: Durham v BAI (Run Off) Ltd (In Scheme of A0.rrangement) and other cases [2008] EWHC 2692 (QB), [2008] All ER (D) 220 (Nov).

The various test cases were heard together to resolve an important dispute over the relevant “trigger” under various employer’s liability insurance policies. The judge noted that the result would have “considerable consequences for several thousand people” and a “continuing impact for many years”.
The underlying claims were brought by employees who suffered and died from mesothelioma resulting from inhalation of asbestos fibres during employment. The employers’ insurers in these types of claims had paid out to victims for many years, but began to decline claims after a decision in the Court of Appeal
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll