header-logo header-logo

A sigh of relief

Part one: Andrew Burns unravels the strands of the asbestos “trigger” trial

The employers’ liability (EL) policy “trigger” litigation was heard over nine weeks in the summer of 2008. It involved six lead cases, seven QCs, 13 junior counsel, numerous solicitors and five major insurers. Mr Justice Burton handed down a 109-page judgment on 21 November 2008: Durham v BAI (Run Off) Ltd (In Scheme of A0.rrangement) and other cases [2008] EWHC 2692 (QB), [2008] All ER (D) 220 (Nov).

The various test cases were heard together to resolve an important dispute over the relevant “trigger” under various employer’s liability insurance policies. The judge noted that the result would have “considerable consequences for several thousand people” and a “continuing impact for many years”.
The underlying claims were brought by employees who suffered and died from mesothelioma resulting from inhalation of asbestos fibres during employment. The employers’ insurers in these types of claims had paid out to victims for many years, but began to decline claims after a decision in the Court of Appeal
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW strengthens global insurance practice and Greater China offering with London Partner hire

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon boosts Energy and Utilities practice with appointment of David McEwing

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson adds international construction arbitration partner in London push

NEWS
Law firm trainees are choosing US firms over their UK comparators, according to Chambers’ annual report on UK trainee satisfaction
A former senior judge has warned peers against scrapping juries for fraud and financial crimes, ahead of the Courts and Tribunals Bill’s second reading in the House of Lords this week
Civil practitioners face changes spanning debt recovery, workplace harassment and possession claims, alongside guidance on insolvency challenges and children proceedings

Finding matrimonial wealth is as challenging as dividing it, as family disputes draw practitioners into asset tracing, offshore structures and insolvency

Agreement between opponents offers no guarantee that a court will approve a retrospective increase to a costs budget
back-to-top-scroll