header-logo header-logo

26 February 2020 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7876 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Signed, sealed & e-delivered?

16663
E-wills: Roderick Ramage asks whether we can have the future now
  • A speculative argument that the formal requirements of the Wills Act 1837 can be satisfied by an electronic will viewed on screen and executed electronically.

In the US the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws provides legislation for states to adopt and, at its annual conference in July 2019, approved the Uniform Electronic Wills Act and recommended it for enactment in all states: www.uniformlaws.com and navigate from the Search Acts button.

This Uniform Act, when adopted, will enable testators to create, sign notarise, and execute a valid will online without the need for the physical presence of another person and enables probate courts to give electronic wills legal effect.

A number of articles and notes speculate whether we should adopt a similar law. The idea is not new. The Law Commission, 2017 consultation paper 231, ‘Making a will’, devoted chapter 6 to electronic wills. Contrary to what some English commentators have written, the Uniform

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll