header-logo header-logo

Signs of pragmatism in the courts

13 October 2017
Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Georgina Squire assesses the courts’ evolving approach to the Jackson reforms, MitchellDenton & sanctions

  • Longevity, prices and earnings inflation all compound the investment risk that claimants face under the MoJ’s planned change to setting the discount rate.

Practitioners will remember (vividly) the panic created following the decision of Master McCloud in the matter of Andrew Mitchell MP v Express Group Newspapers [2013] EWHC 2355 (QB). In that case, the claimant’s solicitors failed to file their costs budget on time and the claimant’s recoverable costs were limited to the court fees. This led to a series of decisions imposing severe sanctions on parties who failed to comply with court orders, however fine the margin.

While the Master’s reasoning in Mitchell could not be faulted, it is unlikely that she intended to create the general culture of fear within the legal profession that followed, or the far-reaching effect of her decision. Fortunately, the Court of Appeal softened the blow of Mitchell when it decided Denton and others v

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll