header-logo header-logo

26 September 2018
Issue: 7810 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Singh LJ to head Investigatory Powers Tribunal

Lord Justice Singh has been appointed president of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, which hears complaints that public authorities or law enforcement agencies have unlawfully used covert surveillance techniques or undercover agents or informants, infringed privacy or breached human rights.

Sir Rabinder Singh will continue to sit as a judge in the Court of Appeal. He said he was ‘absolutely delighted’, and paid tribute to the ‘invaluable’ contributions of his predecessor, Sir Michael Burton, who retired this week after serving on the tribunal since its launch in 2000, being appointed president in 2013.

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett said: ‘Lord Justice Singh brings a wealth of experience in the judiciary and expertise in public law which will be crucial to the tribunal’s vital role in hearing complaints concerning the use of investigatory powers.’

Issue: 7810 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

From global fraud cases to fishing off-grid, Mishcon de Reya’s chair of dispute resolution Hugo Plowman discusses mentors, management switching off

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll