header-logo header-logo

Small claims should be put to the test

31 May 2018
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The ground-breaking judgment of the Supreme Court in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 was central to the Justice Committee’s May report into government proposals to raise the small claims limit for personal injury claims, Patrick Allen, senior partner of Hodge, Jones & Allen, writes in NLJ this week. In Unison, the court ruled the government’s employment tribunal fees unlawful because they prevented access to justice. Allen writes that past and future civil justice reforms, such as fixed costs and the discount rate, ‘should all be subjected to a Unison test and dropped or amended if they fail’.

Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll