header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Smoke alarm

In Brief

Two tobacco giants and 11 retailers have been accused of unlawfully fixing the prices of cigarettes by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). A statement of objections has been issued by the OFT detailing charges against Gallaher, makers of Silk Cut and Benson & Hedges, Imperial Tobacco (whose brands include Lambert & Butler and Embassy) as well as retailers Tesco, J Sainsbury, Asda and Wm Morrison, the Co-operative Group, off-licence group First Quench, Shell, Somerfield and convenience store groups T&S Stores and TM Retail. The OFT claims that between 2000 and 200, these firms made arrangements that restricted the ability of each retailer to determine its selling price independently.

Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll