header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Smoke alarm

In Brief

Two tobacco giants and 11 retailers have been accused of unlawfully fixing the prices of cigarettes by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). A statement of objections has been issued by the OFT detailing charges against Gallaher, makers of Silk Cut and Benson & Hedges, Imperial Tobacco (whose brands include Lambert & Butler and Embassy) as well as retailers Tesco, J Sainsbury, Asda and Wm Morrison, the Co-operative Group, off-licence group First Quench, Shell, Somerfield and convenience store groups T&S Stores and TM Retail. The OFT claims that between 2000 and 200, these firms made arrangements that restricted the ability of each retailer to determine its selling price independently.

Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll