header-logo header-logo

09 December 2016 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

​A smooth transition

Conversion to CIO: Roderick Ramage highlights some legal & practical questions

  • A CIO is a limited liability charity.
  • Existing charities may “convert” to CIO.
  • Members of the existing charity maybecome the members of the CIO.

There is no such thing as a conversion of a charity to a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO), even though the Charity Commission (CC) uses this term. The exercise is the registration of a CIO as a new charity, and the transfer of the existing charity’s assets and engagements to it.

A CIO is a body corporate, registered as a charity with a name ending with “CIO”. CIOs are governed by the Charities Act 2011 (CA 2011), Pt 11 (ss 204 to 250) and general and insolvency regulations, SI 2012/3012 and SI 2012/3013. A CIO provides the advantages of limited liability and a legal entity capable of owing property and entering into obligations without the need for registration under the Companies Acts. References below to parts and sections are to the CA 2011.

There is only one form of CIO,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll