header-logo header-logo

20 January 2011
Issue: 7449 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Social security

Bonner and others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] UKUT 450 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 49 (Jan)

The definition of “error” in r 52(9) of the Social Security (Contributions) Regulations 2001, SI 2001/1004, was wide in terms of the scope of the term, but it was clear about its temporal effect.

It could apply only to errors made at the time of payment, and then only to errors about some then-present or past matter. A future change of law, as yet unannounced, could not be the cause of an “error” within that temporal rule.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

Muckle LLP—Roland Fairlamb

Muckle LLP—Roland Fairlamb

Specialist associate solicitor rejoins Muckle’s leading employment team

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
The legal profession is undergoing a fundamental shift from selling services to creating technology-enabled products, according to Professor Luke Mason, Head of School of Law at Regent's University London
back-to-top-scroll