header-logo header-logo

13 March 2024
Issue: 8063 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Company
printer mail-detail

Solicitors Regulation Authority focuses on in-house community

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has published a raft of resources for in-house solicitors, including draft guidance for employers

The draft guidance aims to explain the professional obligations and standards of solicitors, including what they are unable to do. It clarifies, for example, that solicitors cannot be pressurised to change their legal advice to meet commercial goals or destroy correspondence that might be relevant to future litigation or any investigation.

It highlights that solicitors have duties of confidentiality and legal professional privilege, which means ‘there may be occasions where some individuals or departments will be unable to see what a solicitor has advised on in relation to a particular issue’.

The other draft guidance and case studies, published last week, cover running internal investigations, identifying your client when working in-house, and reporting concerns about wrongdoing when working in-house. It sets out the processes to go through, as well as what to do when, having reported the wrongdoing, the governing body lets it continue. In that case, the draft guidance suggests in-house solicitors avoid doing anything ‘that helps to facilitate the wrongdoing. For example, you should not draft a contract or agreement which you know your employer will have to breach the law to fulfil.’ Nor should the solicitor do ‘anything which suppresses exposure of the information’.

More than 34,500 solicitors—one in five solicitors—work in-house at more than 6,000 organisations.

Juliet Oliver, general counsel at the SRA, said: ‘As well as ongoing feedback from those working in the sector, recent high-profile cases such as the Post Office case have really shone a light on the unique challenges and issues which in-house solicitors can encounter.

‘We have been working closely with the in-house community over the past year to consider what support we can offer to address some of these challenges. We believe these resources will provide valuable support and guidance to in-house solicitors across a range of important issues. But to make sure this is the case, we want to take this opportunity to invite those working in the sector to input.’

View the draft guidance and provide feedback by 19 April on the SRA's website.

Issue: 8063 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Company
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll