header-logo header-logo

Noise at work: sound advice

Alec Samuels discusses when Wagner became ‘too loud’
  • Employers of musicians must pay particular attention to noise levels.
  • The duties of the employer are to be found in the Control of Noise at Work Regulations.

In Goldschreider v Royal Opera House Covent Garden ROHCG [2019] EWCA Civ 711, [2019] All ER (D) 116 (Apr) the claimant was a professional orchestral musician, a viola player, playing in the Royal Opera House (ROH) orchestra.

They were rehearsing Wagner. The claimant was sat immediately in front of the brass, the trumpets. As he was playing he suddenly felt distinctly unwell, dizzy, he could not hear. No noise levels were taken, though subsequently estimated to have been about 90 dB, and no advice to wear ear protectors had been given. He was off work for a while, he attempted to return, again the noise made him feel ill, he could not hear, he could not play, he had to abandon his career as a musician.

Noise control

The duties of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll