header-logo header-logo

12 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SRA warns uninsured firms

Missing 51 must declare themselves

At least 51 firms have still not officially declared their insurance position and could face enforcement action, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned. 

An SRA spokesperson said they know of 51 firms who are still to notify the SRA, out of 130 firms currently in the second part of the extended policy period (EPP) after failing to secure indemnity insurance cover. However, a large number of firms, some of which may be in a similar situation, remain unaccounted for, the spokesperson said. 

The potential sanction for failure to notify ranges from a written warning to a £2,000 fine.

Agnieszka Scott, SRA director for policy and financial protection, said: “So far we have shown a lot of understanding towards firms… but now, more than a month later, there really is no excuse.” 

Firms automatically qualified for the EPP if they had failed to secure a new policy by 1 October. 

Issue: 7584 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll