header-logo header-logo

23 August 2017
Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Staying order lifted on employment claims

The president of the employment tribunals has lifted his order that all employment law claims be stayed if they are reliant on the Supreme Court ruling that employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal fees are unlawful.

Judge Brian Doyle, issued an order on 9 August staying all employment law claims reliant on the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51. He ordered that they be stayed to await decisions of the Ministry of Justice and Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service in relation to the implications of that decision.

However, this order was lifted in Judge Doyle’s second order on 18 August. All employment claims are to proceed in the usual way.

His order states that applications for reimbursement of fees and applications for the reinstatement of claims rejected or dismissed for non-payment of fees ‘shall be made in accordance with administrative arrangements to be announced by the Ministry of Justice and Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service shortly’.

Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll