header-logo header-logo

18 January 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Steele Raymond LLP—Jennifer Rogerson

Commercial solicitors elects managing partner
The Partners of law firm Steele Raymond LLP have recently elected Jennifer Rogerson to the role of Managing Partner.

Jennifer’s election to managing partner comes after six years with the firm, the previous four of which she has been a key member of the firm’s management board. Prior to joining Steele Raymond, Jennifer gained significant experience working at both regional and national law firms.  

Throughout her time at Steele Raymond, Jennifer has been instrumental in a number of landmark projects, including the creation of the firm’s award-winning trainee recruitment programme. The programme continues to nurture and develop high-quality solicitors, many of whom have been retained post-qualification. 

Jennifer takes over the Managing Partner role from Peter Rolph who has held the position for over 10 years. Commercial litigation and construction specialist Peter will continue to head up the Dispute Resolution Team. 

Speaking following her election to Managing Partner, Jennifer said: 'It is an absolute privilege to have been elected by my fellow Partners to the position of Managing Partner. I want to say a special thank you to Peter who has dedicated himself to the role for many years and who will continue to play a significant part in the firm moving forward. I am excited to work alongside my fellow Partners in delivering the vision and strategy for the firm in its specialist markets.'
 
Peter commented: 'I have been very proud to have managed the firm for many years during a significant period of growth. Now is an exciting time for Jennifer and the newly configured Board to take forward the management of the firm as we look forward to a further dynamic period in the firm’s development.'
 
Managing Partner and Chairman, Tim Stone added: 'My personal thanks to Peter for an incredible amount of hard work, dedication and commitment during his many years as the firm’s Managing Partner. I look forward to working with and supporting Jennifer and the new Board as the firm moves into another exciting phase of its strategic growth and development.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll