header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
10 February 2011 / Michael Lind
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Stemming the tide

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Michael Lind considers the place for mediation in a brave new world

Next month Italy will introduce a law making mediation mandatory prior to pursuing litigation. In most commercial disputes, Italian parties will be required to mediate under new rules implemented as a result of the European Union Mediation Directive 2008 (Directive 2008/52/EC). This bold move is designed to help reduce the number of cases before the ailing Italian court system which is bursting at the seams.

Most thought leaders, including the former lord chief justice, Lord Woolf believe that the UK should resist a move to make mediation mandatory, since mediation stands the greatest chance of being used effectively by parties and legal advisers if it is voluntary.

One of the regulatory objectives the Legal Services Act 2007 sought to introduce was greater competition in the provision of legal services. Lawyers are now faced with increased competition from within the profession and from new entities offering legal services outside traditional legal practices.

Scrutiny

As well, in a post recession world, billing practices have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll