header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Company , Public , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A sting in the tail

Michael Salter and Chris Bryden consider the problems left behind by insolvent employers

It is estimated that every day in the 50 companies go out of business. Beyond the initial impact this will have on employees, who are likely to end up losing their jobs, there may also be a secondary sting in the tail when they find that money they are owed will not be as easy to obtain as they first thought.

Not only may this mean that wage payments due and owing are not made, it may also mean that there are difficulties in obtaining redundancy payments. Further, any claims currently pending in the employment tribunal or county court, or potential claims not yet issued, are likely to be affected by the employer’s insolvency. Various legal avenues exist to provide employees of insolvent employers with at least some recompense.

 

INSOLVENCY

The Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) provides that an employee’s claim for remuneration— which includes all wages and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll