header-logo header-logo

Stop & search: misunderstanding the brief?

21 July 2023 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8034 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail
131271
Neil Parpworth outlines the latest thinking—& some potential inaccuracies—from the Home Office on stop & search powers
  • On 19 June, the home secretary Suella Braverman gave a statement to the House of Commons on stop and search, confirming that she wanted police forces to ramp up the use of such powers.
  • Her statement, however, contained a number of inaccuracies, including whether such a power may be used to stop and search children, and whether the police have the power to impose serious violence reduction orders on individuals.

Currently, hardly a day seems to pass without an aspect of policing appearing in the news headlines. Sometimes, the stories relate to the conduct of individual officers who have taken advantage of their position to commit very serious criminal offences. On other occasions, they have involved public statements by senior officers relating to matters within their own force, such as issuing apologies for failings—for example, the recent admissions that the Scottish Police Force and the Avon and Somerset Constabulary are both ‘institutionally

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll