header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 January 2026 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8144 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail

Stop & search: the latest data

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
239514
Neil Parpworth crunches the 2024–25 numbers on police use of stop & search powers
  • The latest Home Office data shows that the stop and search powers the police most often use are s 23(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and s 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.
  • Section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994—suspicionless stop and search—is a relatively little-utilised power and is used inconsistently across forces.
  • This article also considers arrest rates in relation to stop and searches, and the increase in the use of body-worn video.

As is clear from Annex A to PACE Code of Practice A, police officers have a number of statutory stop and search powers which enable them to prevent or detect the commission of criminal offences. These range from the oldest such power, s 6 of the Public Stores Act 1875 (which enables the search of persons, vehicles or vessels for HM stores that have been stolen or unlawfully obtained),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll