header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Strands of opportunity

How do public authorities’ new duties of non-discrimination fit the broader drive for equality? Charles Pigott explains

Recent amendments to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) and the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) create new public sector duties which mirror those introduced in the race relations field in 2001. The new duties under DDA 1995 came into effect on 4 December 2006. Those under SDA 1975 will come into force on 6 April 2007.

Recent months have seen the publication of the Duty to Promote Disability Equality—Statutory Code of Practice and the Gender Equality Duty—Code of Practice for England and Wales and the remaining regulations establishing the precise extent of these duties.

What duties?

The new duties include:
 a general duty to promote equality of opportunity which applies to most public authorities;
 a range of specific duties applying only to named authorities, to reinforce the general duty; and
 an obligation not to discriminate in the performance of public functions, where this is not already covered by existing legislation.
The general duty
The general

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll