header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Strands of opportunity

How do public authorities’ new duties of non-discrimination fit the broader drive for equality? Charles Pigott explains

Recent amendments to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) and the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) create new public sector duties which mirror those introduced in the race relations field in 2001. The new duties under DDA 1995 came into effect on 4 December 2006. Those under SDA 1975 will come into force on 6 April 2007.

Recent months have seen the publication of the Duty to Promote Disability Equality—Statutory Code of Practice and the Gender Equality Duty—Code of Practice for England and Wales and the remaining regulations establishing the precise extent of these duties.

What duties?

The new duties include:
 a general duty to promote equality of opportunity which applies to most public authorities;
 a range of specific duties applying only to named authorities, to reinforce the general duty; and
 an obligation not to discriminate in the performance of public functions, where this is not already covered by existing legislation.
The general duty
The general

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll