header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Strands of opportunity

How do public authorities’ new duties of non-discrimination fit the broader drive for equality? Charles Pigott explains

Recent amendments to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) and the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) create new public sector duties which mirror those introduced in the race relations field in 2001. The new duties under DDA 1995 came into effect on 4 December 2006. Those under SDA 1975 will come into force on 6 April 2007.

Recent months have seen the publication of the Duty to Promote Disability Equality—Statutory Code of Practice and the Gender Equality Duty—Code of Practice for England and Wales and the remaining regulations establishing the precise extent of these duties.

What duties?

The new duties include:
 a general duty to promote equality of opportunity which applies to most public authorities;
 a range of specific duties applying only to named authorities, to reinforce the general duty; and
 an obligation not to discriminate in the performance of public functions, where this is not already covered by existing legislation.
The general duty
The general

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll