header-logo header-logo

Strange but true

01 July 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan casts a wry eye over some interesting cases...

Be honest. What would you do if you were having problems with your neighbour? Kill them? Of course, which is what the defendant in Martin v Sherwood [1995] tried to do. His attempt to mow down the claimant only caused her £500 of injury for which she sued. The defendant then filed a remarkable defence asserting that she had sought to commit suicide by jumping in front of his vehicle. Even the Court of Appeal could see that this defence was a tad unreasonable and so awarded costs in a small claim as it is entitled to do where there is unreasonable conduct-CPR 27.14.

Another exotic defence was put forward in Ferguson v British Gas [2009] EWCA Civ 46. The claimant was bombarded with gas bills by the defendant for supplies she had never had from them. Eventually the claimant brought proceedings for harassment under the 1997 Protection From Harassment Act. Particularly handy here is a six-year limitation period and the ability to recover damages

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll