header-logo header-logo

13 August 2009 / Tony Lewis , Alexandra Underwood
Issue: 7382 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Strictly liable

Tony Lewis & Alexandra Underwood report on the government’s proposed corporate corruption clampdown

After years of criticism of the bribery legislative framework in the UK, the draft Bribery Bill was published by the Ministry of Justice in March this year.

The Bill replaces the bribery offences at common law and under the Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1889, the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906 and the Prevention of Corruption Act 1916.

Broadly, the draft Bill creates two general offences covering the offering, promising and giving of a bribe; and requesting, agreeing to receive a bribe or accepting a bribe; a discrete offence of bribery of a foreign public official; and a new offence of negligent failure of commercial organisations to prevent bribery.

In May, a Parliamentary joint committee was established to scrutinise the draft Bill, culminating in a report of recommendations to Parliament and government which was published on 28 July 2009. 

Corporate offence

A controversial area of the draft Bill was the proposed introduction of a new corporate offence of negligently failing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll