header-logo header-logo

13 August 2009 / Tony Lewis , Alexandra Underwood
Issue: 7382 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Strictly liable

Tony Lewis & Alexandra Underwood report on the government’s proposed corporate corruption clampdown

After years of criticism of the bribery legislative framework in the UK, the draft Bribery Bill was published by the Ministry of Justice in March this year.

The Bill replaces the bribery offences at common law and under the Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1889, the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906 and the Prevention of Corruption Act 1916.

Broadly, the draft Bill creates two general offences covering the offering, promising and giving of a bribe; and requesting, agreeing to receive a bribe or accepting a bribe; a discrete offence of bribery of a foreign public official; and a new offence of negligent failure of commercial organisations to prevent bribery.

In May, a Parliamentary joint committee was established to scrutinise the draft Bill, culminating in a report of recommendations to Parliament and government which was published on 28 July 2009. 

Corporate offence

A controversial area of the draft Bill was the proposed introduction of a new corporate offence of negligently failing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll