header-logo header-logo

Strictly liable

13 August 2009 / Tony Lewis , Alexandra Underwood
Issue: 7382 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Tony Lewis & Alexandra Underwood report on the government’s proposed corporate corruption clampdown

After years of criticism of the bribery legislative framework in the UK, the draft Bribery Bill was published by the Ministry of Justice in March this year.

The Bill replaces the bribery offences at common law and under the Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1889, the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906 and the Prevention of Corruption Act 1916.

Broadly, the draft Bill creates two general offences covering the offering, promising and giving of a bribe; and requesting, agreeing to receive a bribe or accepting a bribe; a discrete offence of bribery of a foreign public official; and a new offence of negligent failure of commercial organisations to prevent bribery.

In May, a Parliamentary joint committee was established to scrutinise the draft Bill, culminating in a report of recommendations to Parliament and government which was published on 28 July 2009. 

Corporate offence

A controversial area of the draft Bill was the proposed introduction of a new corporate offence of negligently failing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll