header-logo header-logo

Protestors & the highway: striking a balance?

03 September 2021 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7946 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Alec Samuels discusses the pressing need for compromise between protesters & the public

We live in a free society under the rule of law. We understand that the exercise of a right may conflict with the exercise of another person’s right, and balance and resolution must be found. Every right carries a corresponding duty or responsibility to respect the rights of others.

Protesters appear and cause obstruction and interference to others. They may be protesting about any number of things. The arms trade. Nuclear weapons. Government policy overseas. A party political issue. Climate change and pollution. COVID regulations. Hunting. Grouse shooting. Low prices for farm produce. A proposed new road or railway. A proposed new speed limit. Religious persecution. Immigration.

Other people may agree with them, or not. But the inescapable fact is that the highway is obstructed, the conduct of normal business is prevented or impeded, access to and egress from private property is prevented or impeded, and indeed private property may be trespassed upon by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll