header-logo header-logo

Striking development

14 August 2009
Issue: 7382 / Categories: Legal News , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Unions must inform employers of the result of a strike ballot as soon as possible to allow them time to plan, the Court of Appeal has confirmed.

In Metrobus v Unite [2009] EWCA Civ 829, trade union Unite appealed against an injunction restraining the union from calling a strike of bus drivers—not on whether the strike should go ahead, but on the argument that the grounds on which the judge decided to grant the injunction constitute a major impediment on its ability and that of any other trade union to call a strike.

The injunction was granted after the High Court found “fatal defects” in the notice of the ballot, including the failure of Unite to notify Metrobus promptly of the result. Unite appealed.

The court ruled that a union must inform an affected employer of the result of a ballot on industrial action as soon as is reasonably practicable, regardless of the result.

Dismissing the appeal, Lord Justice Maurice Kay said: “In this country, the right to strike has never been much more than a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll