header-logo header-logo

Striking the balance or striking out?

13 February 2019 / Shane Crawford
Issue: 7828 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
When should the justice of case proceedings prevail over hardnosed case management practice? Shane Crawford investigates
  • On consideration of decisions during 2018, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has demonstrated that there is a fine line between firm case management and unjustified curtailment of the right to bring or advance a claim.

The steady increase in claims and the pressure on tribunals’ resources bring a sharper focus to the case management powers invested in judges during the preliminary stages of claims.

Robust use of case management powers in the hands of employment judges is a natural progression. On consideration of decisions during 2018, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has, however, demonstrated that there is a fine line between firm case management and unjustified curtailment of the right to bring or advance a claim.

Managing the issues

Managing the extent of the issues in discrimination claims: In Tarn v Dr Hughes & Ors UKEAT/0064/18/DM, [2018] IRLR 1021, the claimant was required by the judge to choose the ten ‘most recent and serious’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll