header-logo header-logo

Striking the balance or striking out?

13 February 2019 / Shane Crawford
Issue: 7828 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
When should the justice of case proceedings prevail over hardnosed case management practice? Shane Crawford investigates
  • On consideration of decisions during 2018, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has demonstrated that there is a fine line between firm case management and unjustified curtailment of the right to bring or advance a claim.

The steady increase in claims and the pressure on tribunals’ resources bring a sharper focus to the case management powers invested in judges during the preliminary stages of claims.

Robust use of case management powers in the hands of employment judges is a natural progression. On consideration of decisions during 2018, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has, however, demonstrated that there is a fine line between firm case management and unjustified curtailment of the right to bring or advance a claim.

Managing the issues

Managing the extent of the issues in discrimination claims: In Tarn v Dr Hughes & Ors UKEAT/0064/18/DM, [2018] IRLR 1021, the claimant was required by the judge to choose the ten ‘most recent and serious’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll