header-logo header-logo

10 June 2015 / Sue Nash
Categories: Opinion , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Suck it up?

Costs budgeting is here to stay so technical changes & a cultural shift are required, says Sue Nash

Like it or not, costs budgeting is here to stay. The speeches last month by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, and Lord Justice Jackson at the Harbour Litigation Funding annual lecture made that abundantly clear.

But two years in, nobody would suggest that all is well with the regime. There is little point now in complaining about the inadequate piloting of costs management—we are where we are. So what is needed is two-fold: technical changes and a cultural shift. 

Tech changes

With Mr Justice Coulson chairing a sub-committee of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee looking at the costs management rules, and added impetus from Jackson LJ’s lecture, technical changes appear to be around the corner. The Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) has set up a working party to identify the key problems we at the coalface are facing, with a lack of uniformity of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll