header-logo header-logo

07 July 2016
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail

Supreme Court accounts for another record year

In the past year, the Supreme Court has witnessed an increase in both urgent hearings and cases requiring panels of more than five justices.

The court’s Annual Report and Accounts, laid before Parliament this week, reveals the Court sat as a panel of seven or nine in 14% of appeals in 2015/16 compared to 12% and 9% in the previous two years.

Larger panels tend to sit where the court is being asked to depart from a previous decision of the Supreme Court or House of Lords, or where a case raises an issue of particularly high constitutional or public importance. The report shows the number of urgent cases—where initial application proceeds to full judgment within weeks—rose from three in 2014-15 to nine this year.

In total, the court heard 92 appeals in 104 days, and delivered 81 judgments. There were more decisions relating to children, tax and tort law than in previous years.

Unusually, there were no cases considering detention or extradition issues. Permission to appeal was granted in 32% of cases.

Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll