header-logo header-logo

07 July 2016
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail

Supreme Court accounts for another record year

In the past year, the Supreme Court has witnessed an increase in both urgent hearings and cases requiring panels of more than five justices.

The court’s Annual Report and Accounts, laid before Parliament this week, reveals the Court sat as a panel of seven or nine in 14% of appeals in 2015/16 compared to 12% and 9% in the previous two years.

Larger panels tend to sit where the court is being asked to depart from a previous decision of the Supreme Court or House of Lords, or where a case raises an issue of particularly high constitutional or public importance. The report shows the number of urgent cases—where initial application proceeds to full judgment within weeks—rose from three in 2014-15 to nine this year.

In total, the court heard 92 appeals in 104 days, and delivered 81 judgments. There were more decisions relating to children, tax and tort law than in previous years.

Unusually, there were no cases considering detention or extradition issues. Permission to appeal was granted in 32% of cases.

Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll