header-logo header-logo

Surprise package

17 February 2012 / Katherine Deal KC
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

When is a travel agent not an agent, asks Katherine Deal

The Package Travel, Package Holiday and Package Tours Regulations 1992 () (the Regulations) came into force on 23 December 1992, revolutionising how injured holiday makers could claim compensation for death, injury or illness. Few personal injury practitioners will not have come across them at some point. Thanks to the Regulations, the provisions of which are now expressly or impliedly incorporated into every package holiday contract, where an English holiday maker has been injured while on a package, he can sue the other party to his holiday contract directly in the English courts under English law, for injuries arising from the negligent provision of services or accommodation which were part of the package. In effect, caught by a modified form of vicarious liability, the tour operator cannot escape liability merely on the basis that those services were provided by a foreign supplier. 

In Titshall v Qwerty Travel [2011] EWCA Civ 1569, [2011] All ER (D) 107 (Dec), the Court of Appeal recently analysed again how

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll