header-logo header-logo

17 February 2012 / Katherine Deal KC
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Surprise package

When is a travel agent not an agent, asks Katherine Deal

The Package Travel, Package Holiday and Package Tours Regulations 1992 () (the Regulations) came into force on 23 December 1992, revolutionising how injured holiday makers could claim compensation for death, injury or illness. Few personal injury practitioners will not have come across them at some point. Thanks to the Regulations, the provisions of which are now expressly or impliedly incorporated into every package holiday contract, where an English holiday maker has been injured while on a package, he can sue the other party to his holiday contract directly in the English courts under English law, for injuries arising from the negligent provision of services or accommodation which were part of the package. In effect, caught by a modified form of vicarious liability, the tour operator cannot escape liability merely on the basis that those services were provided by a foreign supplier. 

In Titshall v Qwerty Travel [2011] EWCA Civ 1569, [2011] All ER (D) 107 (Dec), the Court of Appeal recently analysed again how

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll