header-logo header-logo

22 January 2009
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Case law , Practice areas , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment Law

Switalski v F&C Asset Management Plc [2009] All ER (D) 06 (Jan)

It is exceptional to send a remitted hearing back to the same tribunal. However, in the case of a review on the ground of fresh evidence (r 34(3) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2004 (SI 2004/1861)), even though such a review does not have to take place before the same tribunal that reached the original decision, it is likely to be sent back to the same tribunal to see whether the fresh evidence makes any difference to that tribunal’s earlier conclusions.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Magic Circle hire strengthens Sharpe Pritchard’s infrastructure finance capability

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin adds corporate crime specialist to growing dispute resolution team

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr Co strengthens private client team with partner appointment

NEWS
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
back-to-top-scroll