header-logo header-logo

22 January 2009
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Case law , Practice areas , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment Law

Switalski v F&C Asset Management Plc [2009] All ER (D) 06 (Jan)

It is exceptional to send a remitted hearing back to the same tribunal. However, in the case of a review on the ground of fresh evidence (r 34(3) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2004 (SI 2004/1861)), even though such a review does not have to take place before the same tribunal that reached the original decision, it is likely to be sent back to the same tribunal to see whether the fresh evidence makes any difference to that tribunal’s earlier conclusions.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll