header-logo header-logo

26 March 2025
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing , Property
printer mail-detail

TA6 reassurance for conveyancers

The Law Society is introducing a ‘two-form’ system for property sales, following last year’s TA6 debacle.

The unpopular 5th edition TA6 will be replaced. Instead, a 6th edition TA6 becomes mandatory for Conveyancing Quality Scheme (CQS) members from March 2026. This form gives buyers information once an offer has been accepted.

The second form is not mandatory for CQS members. It contains material information which sellers are recommended to give estate agents when marketing the property, and is designed for conveyancers to use if they are instructed before the property is listed.

A furious row erupted last March after the Law Society updated TA6 in line with National Trading Standards guidance to include ‘material information’ such as proximity of electric car charging points. Property lawyers said the ‘material information’ element increased their risk of liability.

The row escalated into a vote of no confidence against the Law Society’s then president Nick Emmerson and chief executive Ian Jeffery—they survived the vote, postponed mandatory use of the 5th edition and launched a consultation on the form.

Law Society vice president Mark Evans said this week they received 1,200 responses, mainly from solicitors.

Evans said: ‘We hope this new approach will make the TA6 process more straightforward and easier to understand and navigate for conveyancers and their clients.

‘We appreciate that this is a difficult month for our members who are under intense pressure with a stamp duty tax deadline looming and we can assure you that there will not be any overnight changes to the existing 4th and 5th edition forms.’

The Law Society intends to provide training on the forms and will test the forms in the summer on conveyancers, sellers and buyers to make sure they work and find out which areas require most support. 

Issue: 8110 / Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll