header-logo header-logo

Tackling SLAPPs

31 October 2025 / Paige Coulter
Issue: 8137 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Defamation , Libel , Media , Human rights
printer mail-detail
234242
New legislation & SRA guidance mark a stronger stance on litigation that stifles perceived critics, writes Paige Coulter
  • SLAPPs appear to be on the rise, or at least are being identified more frequently in the UK.
  • To address them, ss 194 and 195 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 have come into force, and the Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Bill will go to second reading later this year.
  • The Solicitors Regulation Authority has published further clarification on its approach to ensuring solicitors have acted properly and ethically with regard to SLAPPs.

A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is the term used to describe a legal action taken with the purpose of burdening the defendant with the cost, stress and risk of defending or responding to the SLAPP, typically to dissuade discussion of matters of public interest by intimidating the named defendant(s) and creating a wider chilling effect on public discussion. SLAPPs typically take the form of defamation actions, where a powerful individual or organisation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
Civil justice lurches onward with characteristic eccentricity. In his latest Civil Way column, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist, surveys a procedural landscape featuring 19-page bundle rules, digital possession claims, and rent laws he labels ‘bonkers’
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
back-to-top-scroll