header-logo header-logo

Taking orders

05 September 2013 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Is it appropriate to make an order for costs against a non-party to family proceedings, asks Claire Sanders

Since 1 April 2013, when legal aid became unavailable for private children cases (unless they fall within the domestic violence exception) the issue of costs has become all the more relevant to parties who are now struggling to fund proceedings themselves. In HP v PB,OP and the London Borough of Croydon [2013] EWHC 1956 (Fam) [2013] All ER (D) 138 (Jul) the High Court had to decide whether it was appropriate to make an order for costs against a non-party to the proceedings, in that case a local authority, whose role in the proceedings had been limited to the production of a report.

Facts

The parents of a six-year-old child made cross applications under the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), s 8. During the course of the proceedings the father made allegations that the mother had fabricated illnesses in respect of herself and the child. The district judge directed the local authority, to prepare and file a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll