header-logo header-logo

13 September 2018 / Christopher Burt
Issue: 7808 / Categories: Opinion , Fraud , Profession
printer mail-detail

Taming the fraudulent solicitor

nlj_7808_burt

Does solicitor-facilitated investment fraud threaten to undermine confidence in the profession, asks Christopher Burt

The professionalisation of lawyers can be traced back to the 13th century when practitioners of ecclesiastical law faced scrutiny from the church. Increased regulation led to professionalism, which has evolved to a point where the law is a trusted (if not universally liked) profession. Unfortunately, that trust is sometimes misplaced.

In October 1997 the Law Society Fraud Intelligence Office issued a warning on solicitor facilitated investment fraud. Solicitors were advised that ‘fraudulent investment schemes are on the increase’ and that they ‘should exercise extreme caution if approached by individuals promoting such transactions’. Further warnings have since been issued and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has intervened and taken disciplinary action. After peaking in the early 2000s, the scourge of solicitor facilitated investment fraud has once again started to increase.

Investment fraud is a broad term which includes some of the most notorious scam investments such as diamonds, fine wine and art. It also encompasses trading frauds (such as carbon

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll