header-logo header-logo

Taming the fraudulent solicitor

13 September 2018 / Christopher Burt
Issue: 7808 / Categories: Opinion , Fraud , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7808_burt

Does solicitor-facilitated investment fraud threaten to undermine confidence in the profession, asks Christopher Burt

The professionalisation of lawyers can be traced back to the 13th century when practitioners of ecclesiastical law faced scrutiny from the church. Increased regulation led to professionalism, which has evolved to a point where the law is a trusted (if not universally liked) profession. Unfortunately, that trust is sometimes misplaced.

In October 1997 the Law Society Fraud Intelligence Office issued a warning on solicitor facilitated investment fraud. Solicitors were advised that ‘fraudulent investment schemes are on the increase’ and that they ‘should exercise extreme caution if approached by individuals promoting such transactions’. Further warnings have since been issued and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has intervened and taken disciplinary action. After peaking in the early 2000s, the scourge of solicitor facilitated investment fraud has once again started to increase.

Investment fraud is a broad term which includes some of the most notorious scam investments such as diamonds, fine wine and art. It also encompasses trading frauds (such as carbon

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll