header-logo header-logo

13 September 2018 / Christopher Burt
Issue: 7808 / Categories: Opinion , Fraud , Profession
printer mail-detail

Taming the fraudulent solicitor

nlj_7808_burt

Does solicitor-facilitated investment fraud threaten to undermine confidence in the profession, asks Christopher Burt

The professionalisation of lawyers can be traced back to the 13th century when practitioners of ecclesiastical law faced scrutiny from the church. Increased regulation led to professionalism, which has evolved to a point where the law is a trusted (if not universally liked) profession. Unfortunately, that trust is sometimes misplaced.

In October 1997 the Law Society Fraud Intelligence Office issued a warning on solicitor facilitated investment fraud. Solicitors were advised that ‘fraudulent investment schemes are on the increase’ and that they ‘should exercise extreme caution if approached by individuals promoting such transactions’. Further warnings have since been issued and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has intervened and taken disciplinary action. After peaking in the early 2000s, the scourge of solicitor facilitated investment fraud has once again started to increase.

Investment fraud is a broad term which includes some of the most notorious scam investments such as diamonds, fine wine and art. It also encompasses trading frauds (such as carbon

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll