header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007 / Elaine Banton
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Taming the wildcats

Do no-strike agreements have claws? asks Elaine Banton

Clashes over pay and modernisation have brought much of the country’s postal system to a standstill this month. Recently the threat of further disruption to postal services receded after the Royal Mail and the Communication Workers Union (CWU) reached agreement on pay, pensions and working practices.

The outline agreement was obtained after Royal Mail won a High Court injunction outlawing strikes for two days on the ground that the union had failed to follow the procedure required for notifying their intention to strike. Wildcat strikes had previously hit London, Liverpool and Glasgow after managers tried to introduce new working hours. The London Underground strikes in September 2007 over job security and pensions after Metronet went into administration caused chaos in London. Reported losses to both companies and the economy run into millions of pounds.

WILDCAT ACTION

In August 2007, prison officers staged strike action in breach of a no-strike agreement. The wildcat action by 20,000 of the 30,000 members of the Prison Officers’ Association (POA) led

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
back-to-top-scroll