header-logo header-logo

Taxation

27 July 2012
Issue: 7524 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Bourges-Maunoury and another v Direction des services fiscaux d’Eure-et-Loir: C-558/10 [2012] All ER (D) 153 (Jul)

The Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities made a clear distinction between income of national origin which fell within the authority of the national tax administrations of the member states, on the one hand, and income paid by the EU to its officials and other staff, which was exclusively subject to the law of the EU as regards its taxation, on the other. That division of reciprocal fiscal jurisdiction should exclude any taxation, direct or indirect, of income which was not within the jurisdiction of the member states.

As previously held by the Court of Justice of the European Union, Art 13 of the Protocol prohibited the member states from imposing on an official or staff member of the EU any taxation whatsoever which was based in whole or in part on the payment of the salary to that official or staff member by the EU.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll