header-logo header-logo

21 June 2007 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7278 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing Matters

DOMICILE MATTERS >>
THE MEANING OF A QUALIFIED CORPORATE BOND >>
MITIGATED PENALTIES >>

DOMICILE RULINGS

Many people will be aware of the difficulties which have arisen in obtaining a domicile ruling from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). If an individual wants to know where he is domiciled, he has to seek professional advice because HMRC will not engage in correspondence on the matter.

Not that it gave formal rulings anyway—but obtaining its view was pretty valuable. HMRC takes the—not altogether unreasonable—view that it will only consider the matter if there is a tax liability dependent upon it. For a UK resident, this is not a problem; if he has foreign income he can explain on his tax return that this income is not taxable because it has not been remitted and he can tick the relevant boxes claiming to be domiciled abroad.

However, there are many people who are not UK resident and do not submit tax returns but who are still concerned about their domicile because that is what determines their liability to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll